Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

PENTINGNYA PELATIHAN KURIKULUM 2013 BAGI GURU

Sutjipto Sutjipto
Submitted
Feb 26, 2018
Published
Oct 26, 2016
PDF
Citation
Sutjipto, S. (2016). PENTINGNYA PELATIHAN KURIKULUM 2013 BAGI GURU. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(2), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i2.771
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to express the importance of curriculum training for teachers before its implementation. Results of the study show, first, from the aspect of policy makers affirms that the naming of Curriculum 2013 curriculum ideas including competency standards and core competencies, and the basic framework and structure of the curriculum is essentially unchanged. Second, the curriculum changes and updates in curriculum 2013 includes the cohenrence of KI-KD (Core Competence – Basic Competence) and adjustment of the document, structuring competence spiritual attitudes and social attitudes in all subjects, structuring competence which is not limited by deletion of taxonomic thinking processes, modification of learning and assessment, adjustment of the book contents towards the change of KI-KD and learning, and the provision of creative space for teachers in implementing the curriculum. Third, changes and updates in Curriculum 2013 that emphasizes on curriculum adjustment, easy to learn, easy to teach, measurable, and meaningful to learn is positively responded by those who implement the curriculum. Fourth, the implementation training of Curriculum 2013 is a strategic means to interpret the concept of change and updating of the curriculum as a whole. Fifth, the implementation training of Curriculum 2013 is a kind of art event to process various goals to harmonize the programmed policy by sharing ideas in order to lead to the ideal common understanding about the idea, design, and implementation of the curriculum.

ABSTRAK 

Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini yaitu untuk mengungkapkan pentingnya pelatihan suatu kuri kulum bagi guru sebelum kurikul um i tu di impl ementasi kan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan, pertama, dari sisi pengambil kebijakan memberi penegasan bahwa penamaan kurikulum Kurikulum 2013; ide kurikulum yang mencakup standar kompetensi lulusan dan kompetensi inti, kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum hakikatnya tidak mengalami perubahan. Kedua, perubahan dan pemutakhiran Kurikulum 2013 mencakup koherensi KI-KD dan penyelarasan dokumen; penataan kompetensi sikap spiritual dan sikap sosial pada semua mata pelajaran; penataan kompetensi yang tidak dibatasi oleh pemenggalan taksonomi proses berpikir; penyelarasan pembelajaran dan penilaian; menyelaraskan isi buku terhadap perubahan KI-KD dan pembelajaran; dan pemberian ruang kreatif kepada guru dalam mengimplementasikan kurikulum. Ketiga, perubahan dan pemutakhiran Kurikulum 2013 yang mencirikan keselarasan, mudah dipelajari, mudah diajarkan, terukur, dan bermakna untuk dipelajari ditanggapi positif oleh pelaksana kurikulum. Keempat, program pelatihan pengimplementasian Kurikulum 2013 merupakan wahana yang strategis untuk memaknai konsep perubahan dan pemutakhiran kurikulum secara menyeluruh. Kelima, pelatihan pengimplementasian Kurikulum 2013 bagi guru merupakan perhelatan seni mengolah berbagai tujuan untuk menyelaraskan kebijakan yang diprogramkan melalui ajang berbagi guna mewujudkan pemahaman bersama yang ideal terhadap ide, rancangan, dan pengimplementasiannya.

Keywords
curriculum training curriculum 2013 curriculum updating curriculum adjustment curriculum understanding pelatihan kurikulum kurikulum 2013 pemutakhiran kurikulum penyelarasan kurikulum pemahaman kurikulum.
Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 2665
Downloads : 913
References
Adin-Surkis, A. 2015. Teachers Evaluate the New Curriculum in English: Views regarding Evaluation and Evaluation Tools. Research in Education, 93(1)34-59.

Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing; A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Inc.

Awortwi, N. 2010. Building new competencies for government administrators and managers in an era of public sector reforms: the case of Mozambique. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(4)723-748.

Bensley, D. A. 2011. Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Unified Skills Approach 1st Edition. California: Wadsworth Publishing.

Glevey, K. E. 2008. Thinking skills in England’s National Curriculum. Improving Schools, 11(2)115125.

Grossman, R., Thayer, A. L., Shuffler, M. L., Burke, C. S., & Salas, E. 2015. Critical social thinking: A conceptual model and insights for training. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(2)99-125.

Hasan, S. H. 2002. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Berdasarkan SK Mendiknas Nomor 232/U/2000 dan Alternatif Pemecahannya. Bandung: UPI.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2014. Surat Edaran Mendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 179342/MPK/KR/2014 Perihal Pelaksanan Kurikulum 2013.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2014a. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 160 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemberlakuan Kurikulum Tahun 2006 dan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2014b. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 103 Tahun 2014 tentang Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2014c. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar Oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2014d. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2015a. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2015 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2015b. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2015 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2016a. Panduan Pelatihan Instruktur Nasional Kurikulum Sekolah Dasar Tahun 2016. Jakarta: Dit Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, Ditjen Dikdasmen.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2016b. Modul 1.2 Bahan Pelatihan Kurikulum 2013, Materi Umum: Dinamika Perkembangan Kurikulum 2013 Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2016c. Permendikbud Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Buku yang Digunakan oleh Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi.

Li, D. & Edwards, V. 2013. The impact of overseas training on curriculum innovation and change in English language education in Western China. Language Teaching Research, 17(4)390-408.

Lucas, K. & Rawlins, J. D. 2015. The Competency Pivot: Introducing a Revised Approach to the Business Communication Curriculum. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 78(2)167-193.

Oliva, P. F. 1988. Developing the Curriculum, Edisi 2. Boston: Scott, Foresman and Company.

Oliva, P. F. 2013. Developing the Curriculum, Student Value Edition, 8th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson.
Pinar, W. F. 2012. What Is Curriculum Theory? (Studies in Curriculum Theory Series), 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge.

Print, M. 1993. Curriculum Development and Design. Sydney: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd 9 Atchison Street, St Leonards, NSW 2065 Australia.

Puskurbuk. 2016. KI-KD Kurikulum 2013 Hasil Perbaikan Versi 19022016. Jakarta: Puskurbuk.

Rivenbark, W. C. & Jacobson, W. S. 2014. Three Principles of Competency-Based Learning: Mission, Mission, Mission. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(2)181-192.

Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Scchiro, M. S. 2008. Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Schubert, W. H. 1997. Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility, Second Edition.Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.

Shaw, R. D. 2014. How Critical Is Critical Thinking? Music Educators Journal, 101(2)65-70.

Sivesind, K., Afsar, A., & Bachmann, Kari E. 2016. Transnational policy transfer over three curriculum reforms in Finland: The constructions of conditional and purposive programs(1994–2016). European Educational Research Journal, 15(3) 345-365.

Sparapani, E. F., Perez, D. C., Gould, J., Hillman, S., & Clark, LaCreta. 2014. A Global Curriculum? Understanding Teaching and Learning in the United States, Taiwan, India, and Mexico. SAGE Open, http://sgo.sagepub.com/content, 4(2)1-15, DOI: 10.1177/2158244014536406 diakses 15 Juli 2016

Smeed, J., Terri B., Julie N., & Tracy C. 2015. Testing Times for the Implementation of Curriculum Change: Analysis and Extension of a Curriculum Change Model. SAGE Open, 5(2)1-11, DOI: 10.1177/2158244015581018.

Soler, R. N. C., Quiles, O. L. & Hargreaves, D. J. 2015. The training of music teachers in Colombia: A descriptive analysis. International Journal of Music Education, 33(1)3-17.

Stolk, J. & Harari, J. 2014. Student motivations as predictors of high-level cognitions in projectbased classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(3)231-247.

Sutjipto. 2015. Diversifikasi Kurikulum dalam Kerangka Desentralisasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 21(3)317-338.

Taba, H. 1962. Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. N. 1980. Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Teja, B. B. 2011. Ethical-based Curriculum for Emerging Education towards an Ideal Society. Journal of Human Values, 17(1)73-86.

Tröhler, D. 2016. Curriculum history or the educational construction of Europe in the long nineteenth century. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3)279-297.

Tyler, R.W. 1969. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
van Olphen, J., Wallerstein, N., Evans, J., Brown, R. McClinton,

Tokunaga, J., & Worthen, M. 2015. A San Francisco Bay Area CBPR Training Institute: Experiences, Curriculum, and Lessons Learned. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 1(4)203-212.

Wiles, J. & J. Bondi. 1993. Curriculum Development: A Guide to Practice, 4nd ed. New York:
Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.