Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Register
Login

PANDANGAN GURU DALAM PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM PENDIDIKAN KHUSUS

Sutjipto Sutjipto
Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang Kemendikbud
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v3i1.656
Submitted
Sep 15, 2017
Published
Jul 24, 2018
PDF (BAHASA INDONESIA)
Citation
Sutjipto, S. (2018). PANDANGAN GURU DALAM PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM PENDIDIKAN KHUSUS. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 3(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v3i1.656
Abstract

The purpose of this research is to comprehensively examine the views of special school teachers in the development of special educational curricula on the design and principles. The research involved fourty three teachers froms eight different special schools. Data was collected through forum group discussion dan analyzed by descriptive qualitative method. The results show, first, from the teacher’s point of view, that in designing a special educational curriculum for learners with special needs it should contain practical knowledge, moral character qualities and performance, essential skills, competence, art, and literacy praxis. Secondly, flexibility, functionality, independence, literacy, and vocational are the principles of developing a special education curriculum for learners with special needs. 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara komprehensif pandangan guru sekolah luar biasa dalam pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan khusus pada dimensi perancangan dan asasnya. Penelitian melibatkan empat puluh tiga guru sekolah luar biasa dari delapan sekolah. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik diskusi kelompok terpumpun dan teknik analisis data menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari sudut pandang guru dalam perancangan kurikulum pendidikan khusus untuk peserta didik berkebutuhan khusus harus mengandung muatan-muatan pengetahuan praktis, kualitas karakter moral dan kinerja, keterampilan penting, kompetensi, seni, dan praksis literasi. Selain itu, keluwesan, fungsional, kemandirian, literasi, dan kejuruan merupakan asas-asas pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan khusus bagi peserta didik berkebutuhan khusus.


Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 2521
Downloads : 1399
References
Adhikary, P.K. (2005). Educational reform for linking skills development with employment in Nepal. In M. Singh (Eds.), Meeting basic learning needs in the informal sector integrating education and training for decent work. Empowerment and Citizenship (pp. 215-228). Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.

Alwell, M. & Cobb, B. (2009). Functional life skills curricular interventions for youth with disabilities a systematic review. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 82-93.

Badan Perencana Pembangunan Nasional. (2015). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2015-2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Berbiglia,V. A. (2011). The self-care deficit nursing theory as a curriculum conceptual
---
framework in Baccalaureate education. Nursing Science Quarterly, 24(2), 137-145.

Bouck, E. C. & Kulkarni, G. (2009). Middle-school mathematics curricula and students with learning disabilities: is one curriculum better? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 228244.

Bønløkke, M., Kobow, E. & Kristensen, AK. (2012). Curriculum integrated information literacy a challenge. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 32(3), 53-55.

Chin, J., May, M.,Sullivan-Chin, H. & Woodrick, K. (2014). How can social psychology and group dynamics assist in curriculum development? Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 86-94.

Cochran-Smith, M. & Dudley-Marling, C. (2012). Diversity in teacher education and special education: the issues that divide. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(4), 237-244.

Collin, R. (2014). A Bernsteinian analysis of content area literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(3), 306-329.

Collins, C. & Yates, L. (2009). curriculum policy in south australia since the 1970s: the quest for commonality. Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), 125-140.

Dean, K. L. & Fornaciari, C. J. (2013). Creating masterpieces: how course structures and routines enable student performance. Journal of Management Education, 38(1), 10-42.
Dewayani, S. & Retnaningyah, P. (2017). Suara dari marjin: literasi sebagai praktik sosial. Bandung: Rosda.

Doabler, C. T., Clarke, B., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Kosty, D. B., & Cary, M. S. (2014). the science behind curriculum development and evaluation: taking a design science approach in the production of a tier 2 mathematics curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 97111.

Fadel, C. (2008). “Are they really ready to work?” report by the conference board, P21 et al. OECD/CERI. Paris: Education Cisco Systems, Inc.

Fadel, C., Bialik, M. & Trilling, B. (2015). Four-dimensional education: the competencies learners need to succeed. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Figueiredo, C., Leite, C. & Fernandes, P. (2016). The curriculum in school external evaluation frameworks in Portugal and England. Research in Comparative and International Education, 11(3), 282-297.

Gerrard, J., Albright, J., Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M.,Farrell, L., Freebody, P., et al. (2013). Researching the creation of a national curriculum from systems to classrooms. Australian Journal of Education, 57(1), 60-73.

Hamalik, O. (2007). Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya. Hamilton, D., McFarland, D. & Mirchandani, D. (2000). A decision model for integration across the business curriculum in the 21st century. Journalof Management Education, 24(1), 102-126.

Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 395-407, doi:10.1177/0022487111409415.

Hunt, P., McDonnell, J. & Crockett, M. A. (2012). Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(3), 139- 152.

Jerald, C. D. (2009). Defining A 21st century education. Alexandria, VA: The Center for Public Education. Lamb, J. & Branson, C. M. (2015). Educational change leadership through a new zonal theory lens: Using mathematics curriculum change as the example. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8), 1010-1026.

Lambert, D. (2013). Geography in school and a curriculum of survival. School Field, 11(1), 8598. Leask, B. (2013). Internationalizing the curriculum in the disciplines-imagining new possibilities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(2), 103-118.

Li, Peidong & Laidlaw, M. (2006). Collaborative enquiry, action research, and curriculum development in rural China: How can we facilitate a process of educational change? Action Research, 4(3), 333-350.

Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D. (2014). Thinking outside of literacy: Moving beyond traditional information literacy activities. Information Development, 30(3), 288-290.

Meinert, J. & Reinecke, J. (2017). Self-control during adolescence: Examining the stability of low self-control and the effects of parental social controls. European Journal of Criminology.

Miller, D. L. (2011). Curriculum theory and practice: what’s your style? Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 32-39.

Mogilner, C., Chance, Z. & Norton, M. I. (2012). Giving time gives you time. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1233-1238.

Moore, A. (2015). Understanding the school curriculum: Theory, politics and principles. New York: Routledge.

Nasution, S. (2014). Asas-asas kurikulum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nuttall, A. (2016). The ‘curriculum challenge’: Moving towards the ‘Storyline’ approach in a case study urban primary school. Improving Schools, 19(2), 154-166.

Pilz, M., Krisanthan, B., Michalik, B., Zenner, L. & Li, Jun. (2016). Learning for life and/or work: The status quo of pre-vocational education in India, China, Germany and the USA. Research in Comparative and International Education, 11(2), 117-134. Pink,

Daniel H. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead Books.

Plotner, A. J. & Dymond, S. K. (2016). How vocational rehabilitation transition specialists influence curricula for students with severe disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 1–10, Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2016.

Pugach, M. C. & Blanton, L. P. (2012). Enacting diversity in dual certification programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(4), 254-267.

Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan. (2011). Naskah akademik penyusunan kurikulum, tidak Diterbitkan. Jakarta: Puskurbuk.

Richardson, J.T.E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30(4), 387–415.

Ritter, B.A., Small, E.E., Mortimer, J.W. & Doll, J.L. (2017). Designing management curriculum for workplace readiness: Developing students’ soft skills. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 80–103.

Rock, M.L., Spooner, F., Nagro, S., Vasquez, E., Dunn, C., Leko, et al. (2016). 21st Century change drivers: considerations for constructing transformative models of special education teacher development. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(2), 98-120.

Rychen, D.S. (2009). Key competencies: Overall goals for competence development: An international and interdisciplinary perspective. InR.

Maclean, D. Wilson, dan C. Chinien (Eds.). International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning (pp. 2571-2584). Germany: Springer.

Scheibe, C. L. (2004). A deeper sense of literacy: curriculum-driven approaches to media literacy in the K-12 classroom. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 60-68.

Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21stCentury: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Schoenfeld, A.H. (2016). 100 Years of curriculum history, theory, and research. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 105-111.

Seikkula-Leino, J., Ruskovaara, E., Hannula, H. dan Saarivirta, T. (2012). Facing the changing demands of europe: Integrating entrepreneurship education in finnish teacher training curricula. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 382-399.

Siuty, M. B., Leko, M.M. & Knackstedt, K.M. (2016). Unraveling the role of curriculum in teacher decision making. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 39-57.

Spence, K.K & McDonald, M.A. (2015). Assessing vertical development in experiential learning curriculum. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(3), 296-312.

Spooner, F., Kemp-Inman, A., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Wood, L. & Davis, L.L. (2015). Generalization of literacy skills through portable technology for students with severe disabilities. Research and practice for persons with severe disabilities, 40(1), 52-70.

Sudiarja, A. (2014). Pendidikan dalam tantangan zaman. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius.

Sulaiman, C., Bala, U., Tijani, B.A., Waziri, S.I. & Maji, I.K. (2015). Human capital, technology, and economic growth evidence from Nigeria. SAGE Open, 5(4).

Toner, P. (2010). Innovation and vocational education. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 21(2), 75-98.

Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishing Co.

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2013). Keadaan anak di dunia 2013 anak penyandang disabilitas. Rangkuman Eksekutif. Diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia oleh Agus Riyanto. New York: Unicef.

World Bank. (2010). Education, training and labor market outcomes for youth in Indonesia. Jakarta: The World Bank Office Jakarta.

Zaini, M. (2009). Pengembangan kurikulum: Konsep implementasi evaluasi dan inovasi. Cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: Teras.