Ali, J.K.M., Shamsan, M.A.A., Hezam, T.A., & Mohammed, A.A.Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
Astuti, D.P., & Raudhoh, R. (2021). Menanamkan karakter gemar membaca pada anak melalui gerakan literasi sekolah (GLS) di SD Negeri 131 Kota Jambi. Baitul ’Ulum: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 5(1), 12–30. doi.org/10.30631/baitululum.v5i1.110
Badrasawi, K.J.I., & Kassim, N.L.A. (2020). Reading skill among Malaysian ESL lower secondary students: Which girls and which boys are achieving and underachieving? IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 8(2), 88–111. doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v8i2.329
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
Basyiroh, I. (2017). Program pengembangan kemampuan literasi anak usia dini. TunasSiliwangi, 3(2), 120–134. doi.org/10.22460/ts.v3i2p120-134.646
Bonsu, E.M., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the consumers’ side: Determining students’ perception and intention to use ChatGPT in Ghanaian Higher Education. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 4(1), 1–29. doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2023-0001
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 1–10. doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Chan, C.K.Y., & Luo, J. (2020). A four-dimensional conceptual framework for student assessment literacy in holistic competency development. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 451–466. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1777388
Chinonso, O.E., Theresa, A.M.E., & Aduke, T.C. (2023). ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and challenges. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(02), 33–40. doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001
Dahlan, D., Permana, L., & Oktariani, M. (2020). Teacher’s competence and difficulties in constructing hots instruments in economics subject. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 111-119. doi.org/ 10.21831/cp.v39i1.28869
Fan, P., Gong, H., & Gong, X. (2023). The application of ChatGPT in translation teaching: Changes, challenges, and responses. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11(2), 49-52 doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13530
Fergus, S., Botha, M., & Ostovar, M. (2023). Evaluating academic answers generated using ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1672–1675. doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00087
Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57–63. doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22
Fischer, C., Bol, L., & Pribesh, S. (2011). An investigation of higher-order thinking skills in smaller learning community social studies classrooms. American Secondary Education, 39(2), 5-26. doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/23100399
GarcÃa Sánchez, O.V. (2023). Uso y Percepción de ChatGPT en la Educación Superior. Revista de Investigación En TecnologÃas de La Información, 11(23), 98–107. doi.org/10.36825/ riti.11.23.009
Geske, A., & Ozola, A. (2008). Factors influencing reading literacy at the primary school level. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 6, 71–77.
Gilson, A., Safranek, C.W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R.A., & Chartash, D. (2023). How does ChatGPT perform on the united states medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9. doi.org/10.2196/45312
Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
Harsiati, T. (2018). Karakteristik soal literasi membaca pada program PISA. Litera, 17(1), 90–106. doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i1.19048
Hasanah, U., & Warjana. (2019). Pengembangan pembelajaran literasi membaca untuk meningkatkan daya baca siswa. Media Pustakawan, 26(2), 129 - 139.
Hock, M., & Mellard, D. (2005). Reading comprehension strategies for adult literacy outcomes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(3), 192–200. doi.org/10.1598/jaal.49.3.3
Huda, N., Rizki, A., Oktavia, L., & Ramadhan, S. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap disiplin menggunakan skala likert untuk mengukur sikap disiplin siswa di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Elementary School Journal PGSD FIP Unimed, 13(2), 136-151. doi.org/10.24114/esjpgsd.v13i2.42178
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, riset, dan teknologi. (2020). Desain pengembangan soal AKM. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, BSKAP Kemendikbudristek.
Kaufmann, K., & Peil, C. (2020). The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI): Using WhatsApp to enhance self-reporting and explore media usage in situ. Mobile Media and Communication, 8(2), 229 –246. doi.org/10.1177/2050157919852392
Kilic, S. (2016). Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1). doi.org/ 10.5455/jmood.20160307122823
Klymkowsky, M.W., Garvin-Doxas, K., & Zeilik, M. (2003). Bioliteracy and teaching efficacy: What biologists can learn from physicists. cell biology education, 2(3), 155–161. doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-03-0014
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B.L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Koyuncu, Ã., & Fýrat, T. (2020). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263-275. doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189
Kusmana, S. (2017). Pengembangan literasi dalam kurikulum pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Diglosia: Jurnal Pendidikan, Kebahasaan, dan Kesusastraan Indonesia, 1(1), 140–150. doi.org/ 10.31949/diglosia.v1i1.520
Lai, J.W.M., & Bower, M. (2020). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 241-259. doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12412
Lan, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A bibliometric review study on reading literacy over fourteen years. In Education Sciences, 13(1) 17. doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010027
Leon, A.J., & Vidhani, D. (2023). ChatGPT needs a chemistry tutor too. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(10). doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00288
Librea, N.K., Luciano, A.M., Sacamay, M.L., Libres, M.D., & Jr., A.C. (2023). Low reading literacy skills of elementary pupils in the Philippines: Systematic Review. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(4), 1978–1985. doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.49480
Lin, W.Y., & Chang, Y.J. (2019). Construct validation of the multiple-choice items of the English subtest of the advanced subjects test in Taiwan. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 16(1), 80–94
Linnakyla¨, P., Malin, A., & Taube, K. (2004). Factors behind low reading literacy achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 232–249. doi.org/10.1080/ 00313830410001695718
Maeng, W., Ahn, H., Yoon, J., & Lee, J. (2016). Can mobile instant messaging be a useful interviewing tool? A comparative analysis of phone use, instant messaging, and mobile instant messaging. 45–49. doi.org/10.17210/hcik.2016.01.45
Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2020). Understanding and supporting literacy development among english learners: A deep dive into the role of language comprehension. AERA Open, 6(1), 1–7. doi.org/10.1177/2332858420912198
McGaw, B. (2003). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000 Publications 2000. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
McGaw, B. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world first results from PISA 2003. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
McGaw, B. (2007). PISA 2006: Sciences competecies for tomorrow’s world: Volume 1 analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
McGaw, B. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do: Volume 1 analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
McGaw, B. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do: Volume 1 analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L. (2023). How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34
Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J.K., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT for teachers: Practical examples for utilizing artificial intelligence for educational purposes. Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 10(3), 200-205. doi.org/10.4103/ijves.ijves_37_23
Morze, N., Vember, V., & Boiko, M. (2019). Using of digital technologies for formative assessment. Open Educational E-Environment of Modern University, Special Edition. doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2019s19
Mudra, H. (2018). Metacognitive online reading strategies among pre-service EFL teachers in Indonesia. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(2), 151–164. doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2018.72.5
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K.T. (2012). PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Nurahma, G.A., & Hendriani, W. (2021). Tinjauan sistematis studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif. Mediapsi, 7(2), 119–129. doi.org/10.21776/ub.mps.2021.007.02.4
Owan, V.J., Abang, K.B., Idika, D.O., Etta, E.O., & Bassey, B.A. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2307. doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/ 13428
Prawira, M.J., Cahyana, U., & Bagaskorowati, R. (2018). Influence of ICT media and critical thinking ability to the ability of literacy science literacy students elementary school. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 6(04). doi.org/10.14741/ijmcr/v.6.4.2
Prihatsanti, U., Suryanto, S., & Hendriani, W. (2018). Menggunakan studi kasus sebagai metode ilmiah dalam psikologi. Buletin Psikologi, 26(2), 126 – 136. doi.org/10.22146/ buletinpsikologi.38895
Puspita, G.A., & Irwansyah, I. (2018). Pergeseran budaya baca dan perkembangan industri penerbitan buku di Indonesia: Studi kasus pembaca e-book melalui aplikasi iPusnas. BIBLIOTIKA/ : Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 2(1), 13–20. doi.org/10.17977/um008v2i12018p013
Qumillaila, Q., Susanti, B.H., & Zulfiani, Z. (2017). Pengembangan augmented reality versi android sebagai media pembelajaran sistem ekskresi manusia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXVI(1), 57-69. doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i1.9786
Rathod, K.D. (2023). A review of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 07(07), 1–8. doi.org/ 10.55041/ijsrem24976
Ristanto, R.H., & Darmawan, E. (2020). Biology reading literacy: Measurement and empowerment through CIRC learning model. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1305–1318. doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.679378
Ristanto, R.H., Djamahar, R., Heryanti, E., & Ichsan, I.Z. (2020). Enhancing students’ biology critical thinking skill through CIRC-Based Scientific Approach (Cirsa). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4A), 1–8. doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081801
Ristanto, R.H., Zubaidah, S., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2017). Scientific literacy of students learned through guided inquiry. International Journal of Research & Review, 4(5), 23–30. doi.org/https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 364–389. doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD. doi.org/10.1787/ b25efab8-en
Setiawan, A., & Luthfiyani, U.K. (2023). Penggunaan ChatGPT untuk pendidikan di era Education 4.0: Usulan inovasi meningkatkan keterampilan menulis. Jurnal PETISI, 4(1), 49–58. doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpetisi.v4i1.3680
Silinskas, G., Ahonen, A.K., & Wilska, T.A. (2021). Financial literacy among Finnish adolescents in PISA 2018: The role of financial learning and dispositional factors. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 9(1), 24. doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00118-0
Smith, M.C., Mikulecky, L., Kibby, M.W., Dreher, M. J., & Dole, J.A. (2000). What will be the demands of literacy in the workplace in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 378–383. doi.org/10.1598/rrq.35.3.3
Stutz, P., Elixhauser, M., Grubinger-Preiner, J., Linner, V., Reibersdorfer-Adelsberger, E., Traun, C.,Wallentin, G.,Wöhs, K., & Zuberbühler, T. (2023). Ch(e)atGPT? An anecdotal approach addressing the Impact of ChatGPT on teaching and learning GIScience. GI_Forum, 11(1), 140–147. doi.org/10.1553/giscience2023_01_s140
Supriyadi, E. (2022). Eksplorasi penggunaan ChatGPT dalam penulisan artikel pendidikan matematika. Papanda Journal of Mathematics and Science Research, 1(2), 54–68. doi.org/10.56916/pjmsr.v1i2.255
Tan, Y., Fan, Z., Wei, X., & Yang, T. (2022). School belonging and reading literacy: A multilevel moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–11. doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.816128
Thompson, T. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ interpretation of higher-order thinking in Bloom’s Taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 96-109. doi.org/ 10.29333/iejme/221
Veddayana, C., Romadhon, S., Aldresti, F., & Suyono, S. (2023). Rasionalitas implementasi ChatGPT dalam pembelajaran keterampilan menulis karya ilmiah. GHANCARAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. doi.org/10.19105/ghancaran.vi.11778
Waltzer, T., Cox, R.L., & Heyman, G.D. (2023). Testing the ability of teachers and students to differentiate between essays generated by ChatGPT and high school students. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, 1–9. doi.org/10.1155/2023/1923981
Wood, J. (2021). A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1173–1190. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174
Xames, M.D., & Shefa, J. (2023). ChatGPT for research and publication: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 390–395. doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.20
Xiao, C., Xu, S. X., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., & Xia, L. (2023). Evaluating reading comprehension exercises generated by LLMs: A showcase of ChatGPT in education applications. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. doi.org/10.18653/ v1/2023.bea-1.52
Yadav, P.V., Kollimath, U.S., Giramkar, S.A., Pisal, D.T., Badave, S.S., & Dhole, V. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in talent acquisition process: A study with reference to IT industry. 2023 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (IITCEE), Bengaluru, India, 2023, (885-889), doi: 10.1109/IITCEE57236.2023.10090973.
Yandola, K.O. (2023). Using the Chatgpt in the educational process. Innovate Pedagogy, 2(57),261-265. doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2023/57.2.53
