Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Pengaruh Kekohesifan, Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Kerja Terhadap Efektivitas Organisasi

Bambang Dwidjo Kustoro
Submitted
Dec 14, 2016
Published
May 10, 2010
PDF
Citation
Kustoro, B. D. (2010). Pengaruh Kekohesifan, Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Kerja Terhadap Efektivitas Organisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 16(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i3.465
Abstract

The research was conducted at educational tools companies to obtain with the effect of cohesiveness, leadership style and organizational culture on organizational effectiveness, by using a survey method with path analysis applied in testing hypothesis. The amount of 417 companies selected by simple random sampling with 120 samples and each sample was represented by its director or owner to fill the data. The research reveals that: 1) there is a direct positive effect of cohesiveness on organizational culture; 2) there is a direct positive effect of cohesiveness on organizational effectivenes; 3) there is a direct positive effect of leadership style on organizational culture; 4) there is a positive direct effect of leadership style on organizational effectivenes; and 5) there is a direct positive effect of organizational culture on organizational effectivenes. Due to this findings it could be drawn that 6) there is a indirect positive effect of cohesiveness on organizational effectivenes through organizational culture; and 7) there is an indirect positive effect of ledership style on organizational effectivenes through organizational culture.The result explain that the cohesiveness, leadership style, organizational culture are the variances of organizational effectivenes. Therefore, it implies that the organizational effectivenes can be improved by developing the cohesiveness, leadership style organizational culture.

 

ABSTRAK

Obyek penelitian adalah untuk meneliti pengaruh kekohesifan, gaya kepemimpinan, budaya kerja, daya saing terhadap efektivitas organisasi. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada perusahaan pengadaan alat-alat teknik pendidikan dengan mempergunakan metoda Path Analysis untuk membuktikan hipotese. Dilakukan pada 417 perusahaan yang diwakili oleh 120 sampel dan setiap sampel diwakili oleh direktur yang ditunjuk oleh perusahaan atau oleh pemilik perusahaan dalam menjawab instrumen penelitian berupa questioinaires. Penelitian membuktikan; terdapat pengaruh positif langsung kekohesifan terhadap budaya kerja, terdapat pengaruh langsung positif kekohesifan terhadap efektivitas organisasi, terdapat pengaruh positif langsung gaya kepemimpinan terhadap budaya kerja, terdapat pengaruh positif langsung gaya kepemimpinan terhadap efektivitas organisasi, terdapat pengaruh positif langsung budaya kerja terhadap efektivitas organisasi, terdapat pengaruh positif tidak langsung kekohesifan terhdap efektivitas organisasi melalui budaya kerja, terdapat pengaruh positif tidak langsung gaya kepeminpinan terhadap efektivitas organisasi. melalui budaya kerja. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa kekohesifan,gaya kepemimpinan dan budaya kerja adalah varian dari efektivitas organisasi. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa efektivitas organisasi dapat ditingkatkan dengan mengembangkan kekohesifan, gaya kepemimpinan dan budaya kerja.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 686
Downloads : 628
References
Bender, Peter Urs. 1997. Leadership From Within. Canada: Stoddart Publishing.
Collins, Jim. 2001. Good to Great. New York: Harper Collins.
Colquitt, Jason A., Jeffery A. Lepine & Michael J. Wesson. 2009. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Drucker, Peter F. 1997. The Effective Executive, terjemahan Agus Teguh Handoyo. Jakarta: Elex media Komputindo.
Flaney, Thomas P., David A. Hofrichter, Paul E. Platten. 1996. People, Performance, and Pay. New York: Free Press.
Franzoi, Stephen L. 1996. Social Psychology. Madison: Brown and Benchmark.
George, Jennifer M. & Gareth R. Jones. 2002. Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Griffin, Ricky W. 1997. Management. New Delhi: Houghton Miffin Company.
Hersey, Paul & Kenneth H. Blanchard. 2001. Organization Human Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Inamori, Kazuo. 1997. For People and For Profit. Tokyo: Kodansha International Ltd.
Kotter, John P. & James L. Hesket. 1997. Corporate Culture and Performance, terjemahan Benyamin Molan. Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo.
Kreitner, Robert & Angelo Kinicki. 2004. Organizational Behavior. Boston: Richard D. IRWIN, Inc.
Luthans, Fred. 2001. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
McShane, Steven L. & Mary Ann Von Glinow. 2005. Organizational Behavior. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Mullins, Laurie J. 2005. Management and Organisational Behaviour. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Nadler, David A. & Michael L. Tushman, “The Organization of the Future: Strategic Imperative and Core Competencies for 21st Century”, dalam Joice S. Osland, David A. Kolb & Irwin M. Rubin .eds 2001 The Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Newstrom, John W. & Keith Davis. 2001. Organizational Behavior: Hill Human Behavior at Work. New
Delhi, Tata McGraw- Publishing Co. Ltd.
Robbins, Stephen P. 2000. Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.,
Robbins, Stephen P. 1997. Managing Today. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,
Sallis, Edward. 1999. Total Quality Management in Education. London: Harper Collins.
Simon, Herbert A. 1997. Administrative Behavior. New York: The Free Press,
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistim Pendidikan Nasional.
Wagner III, John A. & John R. Hollenbeck. 1992. Management of Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc..
Wexley, Kenneth N. & Gary A. Yukl. 2001. Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc..