Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Efektivitas Perubahan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan (LPTK)/Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (IKIP) menjadi Universitas

Idris H.M Noor
Submitted
Aug 16, 2016
Published
Sep 16, 2013
PDF
Citation
Noor, I. H. (2013). Efektivitas Perubahan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan (LPTK)/Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (IKIP) menjadi Universitas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 19(3), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v19i3.296
Abstract

The research investigates the effectiveness of the status change of teacher training institute into university. Research uses mixed quantitative and qualitative approach, evaluation and case study methods. sampling are stratified and purposive from eight public universities. Data collecting was Focus Group Discussion (FGD), kuessioner, and interview. Data analysis used percentage quantitative and case analysis of the unique of each study program at each university. The study shows: 1) universities are still keeping their roles as their core business to produce teachers and educational administrators, 2) Students competence significantly improves due to the education and non education program of the study reciprocally give or help each other as well as share their experience to enhance students’ competence in science and social subjects, 3) the enrolement of students tends to be increased every year with high academic qualification candidates, 4) curriculum consists of education and non education (pure science and social subjects), 5) lectrurers’ qualification also increases significantly, srata 1 tends to be decrease, while master dan doctor degree-S2/S3 increase significantly every year/period, 6) budget of each university and faculty is different due to the different location of universities and needs of each faculty, and 7) students cummulative achievement index (3.275) increases every year.


ABSTRAK

 

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendapatkan informasi mengenai efektivitas perubahan status kelembagaan IKIP/LPTK ke universitas. Pendekatan yang digunakan, yaitu pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif (mixed method) dengan metode evaluasi dan metode studi kasus. Sampel menggunakan stratified dan purposive sampling dari delapan universitas negeri. Pengumpulan data melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD), wawancara, pengisian kuesioner. Analisis data menggunakan teknis kuantitatif dengan persentase dan analisis kasus melihat keunikan masing-masing prodi di masing-masing universitas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa:1) universitas eks LPTK/ IKIP tetap menjalankan core bussines-nya sebagai produsen pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan, 2) peningkatan kompetensi keilmuan mahasiswa cukup efektif karena program studi pendidikan dan program studi murni saling mengisi satu sama lain, 3) peminat mahasiswa terus meningkat setiap tahunnya dengan calon mahasiswa yang berkualifikasi akademik tinggi, 4) menggunakan kurikulum pendidikan dan nonpendidikan, 5) kualifikasi dosen terus meningkat (pendidikan S1 terus berkurang, sedangkan S2 dan S3 terus bertambah), 6) biaya setiap universitas dan fakultas berbeda karena perbedaan tempat dan kebutuhan, dan 7) keluaran (ouput) lulusan mahasiswa memiliki IPK mencapai di atas rata-rata di atas 3.275.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 729
Downloads : 671
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Barnett Ronald and Roberto De Napoli. 2008. Changing Identities in Higher Education Voicing Perspectives. 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016.
Bell, Judith. 1993. Doing Your Research Project. A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education and Social Science. Open University Press. Buckingham.
Briggs, Ann R.J. and Daniela Sommefeldt. 2002. Managing Effective Learning and Teaching. Paul Chapman Publishing. Paul Chapman Publishing A SAGE Publications Company 6 Bonhill Street London EC2A 4PU.
Calderhead, James and S.B. Shorrock.1997. Understanding Teacher Education Case Studies in the Professional Development of Beginning Teachers. The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc., 1900 Frost Road, Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007. Washington, D.C.
Campbell, Harry F. and Richard P. C. Brown. 2003. Benefit-Cost Analysis. Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets. Cambridge University Press. United Kingdom.
Cresswell John.W. 2010. Research Design. Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Third Edition. Osage publications. Thousand Oaks California 91320.2009. Terjemahan.Ahmad Fawaid. Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar, Celeban Timur UH III/548, Yogyakarta.
Denny, Richard. 2009. Motivate to Win. Kogan Page Limited 120 Pentonville Road London N1 9JN United Kingdom USA.
Donaldson, Stewart I and Michael Scriven. 2003. Evaluating Social Programs and Problems Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 10 Industrial Avenue Mahwah, NJ 07430, Publishers 2003 Mahwah, London.
Gibson, J.L, Ivancevich and Donelly. 1995. Organisasi dan Manajemen: Perilaku, Struktur, dan Proses. Jakarta: Erlangga
Hinn, D. M Benson, A, and Lloyd, C (Editor). 2001. Visions of Quality: How Evaluators Define, Understand and Represent Program Quality. Elsevier Science Lid The 8ou, L.An & Ford Line Kidliq &’ DII, Otford Oxlig B, UK.
Hunt, Lynne, Adrian Bromage and Bland Tomkinson. 2006. The Realities of Change in Higher Education. Interventions to promote learning and teaching. Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016.
Larry, Walther M. & Cristopher J. SKousen. 2009. Budgeting and Decision Making. Cristopher J. SKousen Publishing ApS. WWW.Bookboon.com.
Lisa, Wise, Lauress L. and Winters. Tina M., (Editors). 2005. Advancing Scientific Research in Education. Center for Education Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055.
Lynne Hunt, Adrian Bromage and Bland Tomkinson (ed) 2006. The Realities of Change in Higher Education. Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016.
Mislevy, R.J. and Knowles, K.T., (editors) 2002. Performance Assessments for Adult Education Exploring the Measurement Issues. The National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, NWBox 285 Washington, DC 20055.
O’Neill. J and Neil. Kitson (Ed) 2002. Effective Curriculum Management. Taylor & Francis e-Library, New York.
Patton, Carl, V,& David S.Sawicky. 1993. Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning, London: Prentice Hall.
Rindjin, Ketut. 2008. Studi Perbandingan Guru SMP Lulusan universitas dengan Non-LPTK/IKIP Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Bekerja Sama dengan Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja.
Steers, M, dan Richard (1980:192) (http://jurnal-sdm.blogspot.com).
Surat Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 93 Tahun 1999 tentang IKIP sebagai lembaga penyedia tenaga pendidik telah berubah menjadi universitas.
Surat Keputusan Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi Depdikbud, Nomor 1499/D/1996 pada 20 Juni 1996 yang menetapkan IKIP Yogyakarta dan 3 IKIP lainnya (IKIP Medan, IKIP Padang dan IKIP Malang) diberi perluasan tugas ke arah perubahan kelembagaan menjadi universitas.
Sallis, Edward. 2006. Total Quality managemen in Education: Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan IRCiSoD, Yogyakarta.
Sumaryadi, I Nyoman. 2005. Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah. Penerbit Citra Utama.
Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
White, R.V. 1987. The ELT Curriculum: Design. Innovation and Management. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wilson, John P (ed). 2001. Human Resource Development. Learning and Training for Individuals and Organizations. Kogan Page Limited 120 Pentonville Road London N1 9JN.
Winkel, W.S. 1996. Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta. PT. Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia.