Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja, dan Harapan Dosen terhadap Kepuasan Kerja

Saur M Tampubolon
Submitted
Aug 12, 2016
Published
Jun 3, 2013
PDF
Citation
Tampubolon, S. M. (2013). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja, dan Harapan Dosen terhadap Kepuasan Kerja. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 19(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v19i2.273
Abstract

The objectives of this research is to find out the effects of leadership style, work environment, and the lecturers satisfaction. The research has been conducted at Pakuan University, Bogor. The method used was a survey with data analysis of path analysis. The respondents were 72 out of 264 total lekturers in the university. They were selected randomly. The research finding are as the followings: 1) leadership style has a direct effect on the lecturer’s satisfaction; 2) on the work environment has also a direct effect on the job satisfaction; 3) the expectation gives a direct effect on job satisfaction, but the leadership style gives and indirect effect on job satisfaction, but the leadership style gives an indirect effect on job satisfaction through expectation; and 4) the working environment has also indirect effect on the job satisfaction through expectation. It can be concluded that the lecturer’s satisfaction is affected by the leadership style, work environment and the lecturer’s expectation. Therefore, the recommendation ofthis research is that the head master of university should apply transformational leadership style in his environment, to fullfil lectures professionality work through academic and non academic.


ABSTRAK

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan, lingkungan kerja, dan harapan dosen terhadap kepuasan kerja. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Universitas Pakuan Bogor melalui metode survai dengan analisis data analisis jalur. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 72 orang dosen dari 264 dosen tetap.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat: 1) gaya kepemimpinan berpengaruh langsung terhadap kepuasan kerja; 2) lingkungan kerja berpengaruh langsung terhadap kepuasan kerja; dan 3) harapan dosen berpengaruh langsung terhadap kepuasan kerja; 4) gaya kepemimpinan berpengaruh tidak langsung terhadap kepuasan kerja melalui harapan dosen; dan 5) lingkungan kerja berpengaruh tidak langsung terhadap kepuasan kerja melalui harapan dosen. Dengan demikian, kepuasan kerja dipengaruhi oleh gaya kepemimpinan, lingkungan kerja, dan harapan dosen. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan kepada pemimpin universitas agar menerapkan gaya kepemimpinan transformasional di lingkungannya dan untuk memenuhi harapan dan kepuasan kerja para dosen agar bekerja berbudaya mutu dan profesional, baik secara akademik maupun non akademik.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 633
Downloads : 1775
References
Aldag, Ramon J. and Timothy Stearns. 1997. Management, Ohio: South Western Publishing.
Baron, Robert A. and D. Byrne. 1998. Behavior in Organizations Understanding and Human Side of Work, New York: Prentice-Hall.
Daft, Richard, L. 2004. Organization Theory and Design, Amerika: South-Western Collegr Publishing.
George, Jennifer M and Gareth R. Jones. 2005. Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly. 2006. Organization: Behavior, Structure, Process, Texas: Business Publications, Inc.
Greenberg, Gerald and R.A Baron. 1995. Behavior in Organizations Understanding Managing The Human Side of Work, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Griffin, Ricky. 1987. Management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, Company.
Hughes, R, L., Ginnett & Curphy. 1999. Leadearship: Enhancing the Lesson of Experience, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
House, Robert J., Terence R. Mitchel. 1974. Path Goal Theory of Leadership. Journal of Contemporary, Autumn.
Ivancevich, John M. 2001. Human Resource Management, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Luthans, Fred. 2002. Organizational Behavior, New York: The McGraw-Hill, Co.
Munandar, Ashar. S. 2001. Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Jakarta: UI Press.
Panggabean, Mutiara S. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Robbins, S. P. 2006. Organizational Behavior, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Robbins S. P. & Timothy A. Judge. 2009. Organizatonal Behavior, New York: Upper Saddle River.
Salusu.1996., Pengambilan Keputusan Strategik, Jakarta: Grasindo.
Semiawan, Conny R. 1999. Pendidikan Tinggi: Peningkatan Kemanduan Manusia, Jakarta: Grasindo.
Schernerhorn, J. R & N. Osborn. 1982., Managing Organization Behavior, Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Smith, R. E. 1996. Effects of Coping Skills Training on Generalized Self-efficacy andLocus of Control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 (2).
Wijatno, Serian. 2009. Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Secara Efisien, Efektif, dan Ekonomis, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Wexley and Yukl. 2005. Organizational Behavior andPersonnel Psychology. Illions: Richard D. Irwin.
Yukl, Gary. 2006. Leadership in Organizations, New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.