Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Efektivitas Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Mind Map terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika

Agus Hariyanto
Submitted
Feb 12, 2016
Published
Dec 14, 2015
PDF UNTITLED
Citation
Hariyanto, A. (2015). Efektivitas Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Mind Map terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 21(3), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v21i3.188
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of problem based learning models, aided with mind map, on student’s ability to solve problems creatively based on prior knowledge. Results of the study showed that: 1) students who studied with the PBL mind map-aided model had higher creative problem-solving ability than students who studied with only PBL, 2) in terms of higher prior knowledge, students who studied with the PBL mind map-aided model had higher creative problem-solving ability than students who studied with only PBL, 3) in terms of lower prior knowledge, students who studied with the PBL mind map-aided model had higher creative problem-solving ability than students who studied with only PBL, 4) The learning model used interacts with students’ prior knowledge and students’ creative problem-solving ability, 5) the creative problem-solving ability of students who used the PBL mind map-aided model was more effective than the creative problem solving ability of students with greater prior knowledge who used PBL models; 6) The creative problem-solving ability of students who used the PBL mind mapaided model was more effective than students with low prior knowledge who used the PBL learning model; 7) the creative problem-solving ability of students who used the PBL mind map-aided model was more effective than students who used the PBL learning model. It can be concluded that the PBL mind map-aided model is more effective than the PBL learning model in developing creative problem-solving abilities in 10th grade students, regardless of their prior knowledge levels.



ABSTRAK

 

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji efektivitas model problem based learning berbantuan mind map terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif ditinjau dari kemampuan awal siswa kelas X. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif yang belajar dengan model PBL berbantuan Mind Map lebih tinggi dibandingkan pembelajaran PBL; 2) Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif siswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran model PBL berbantuan mind map lebih tinggi dibandingkan pembelajaran PBL untuk siswa yang memiliki kemampuan awal tinggi; 3) Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif siswa yang belajar dengan pembelajaran model PBL berbantuan Mind Map lebih tinggi dibandingkan pembelajaran PBL untuk siswa yang memiliki kemampuan awal rendah;  4) Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan kemampuan awal terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif; 5) Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif pebelajar dengan model PBL berbantuan mind map lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran PBL untuk siswa yang memiliki kemampuan awal tinggi; 6) Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif pebelajar dengan model PBL berbantuan mind map lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran PBL untuk siswa yang memiliki kemampuan awal rendah; 7) Kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif pebelajar dengan model PBL berbantuan mind map lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran PBL. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa model PBL berbantuan mind map lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran PBL terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif ditinjau dari kemampuan awal siswa kelas x.

Keywords
problem based learning mind map students’ creative problem-solving ability prior knowledge model problem based learning pemecahan masalah fisika secara kreatif kemampuan awal.
Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 1092
Downloads : 703
References
Abdullah, S. & Shariff, A. 2008. The Effects of Inquiry-Based Computer Simulation with Cooperative Learning on Scientific Thinking and Conceptual Understanding of Gas Law. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 4(4), hlm. 387-389.
Arends, R. I. 2008. Learning to Teach (Belajar untuk Mengajar). Yogyakarta: Pustaka. Awang, H. & Ramly, I. 2008. Creative Thinking Skill Approach Through Problem-Based Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 3(1), hlm. 22-23.
Baer, J. & Kaufman, J.C. 2005. Bridging Generality and Specificity: The Amusement Park Theoritical (APT) Model of Creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), hlm. 158-162.
Bilgin, I., Senocak, E., Sozbilir, & Mustafa. 2009. The Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concepts. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(2), hlm. 153-164.
Cheong, F. 2008. Using a Problem-Based Learning Approach to Teach an Intelligent Systems Course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, hlm. 58-59.
Chia, L. & Chin, C. 2011. Problem Based Learning Tools The Science Teacher. Academic Research, 75(8), hlm. 44-49.
Dalal, S. & Rani, G. 2013. Relationship of Creativity and Intelegence of Senior Secondary Students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(7), hlm. 57-60.
De Cock, M. 2012. Representation Use and Strategy Choice in Physics Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(020117), hlm. 50-60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117, diakses 9 Februari 2013.
Demirel, M. & Turan, B. A. 2010. The Effect of Problem Based Learning on Achievement,Attitude, Metacognitive Awareness and Motivation. Hacettepe Journal of Education,(38), hlm. 55-66.
Folashade, A & Akinbobola, A.O. 2009. Constructivist Problem Based Learning Technique and the Academic Achievement of Physics Students with Low Ability Level in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Eurasian Journal Physics and Chemistry Educations, 1(1), hlm. 45-51.
Howell, D.C. 2011. Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Seventh Edition. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Keil, C., Haney, J. & Zoffel, J. 2009. Improvements in Student Achievement and Scienc Process Skills Using Environmental Health Science Problem-Based Learning Curricula. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1), hlm. 1-18.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2012. Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta Kemdikbud.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2013. Salinan Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 69 Tahun 2013 Tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah.
Kleibeuker, S.W., Carsten, K.W., Dreu, D., & Crone, E.A. 2013. The Development of Creative Cognition Across Adolesence: Distinct Trajectories for Insight and Divergent Thinking. Development Science, 16(1), hlm. 2-12.
Kohl, P.B. & Finkelstein, N.D. 2005. Student Representational Competence and Self-Assessment When Solving Physics Problems.Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(010104), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010104, diakses 19 Februari 2013.
Kohl, P.B. & Finkelstein, N.D. 2006a. Effect of Instructional Environment on Physics Students’Representational Skills. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, (Online), 2, 010102, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010102, diakses 19 Februari 2013.
Kohl, P.B. & Finkelstein, N.D. 2006b. Effects of Representation on Students Solving Physics Problems: A Fine-Grained Characterization. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2(010106),http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010106, diakses 9 Februari 2013.
Long, D & Carlson, D. 2011. Mind The Map: How Thinking Maps Affect Student Achievement. An Online Journal for Teacher Researcher, 13(2), hlm. 1-3.
Mason, A. & Singh, C. 2010a. Helping Students Learn Effective Problem Solving Strategies by Reflecting with Peers. American Journal of Physics, 78(7), hlm. 11-14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.3319652, diakses 2 April 2013.
Mason, A. & Singh, C. 2010b. Surveying Graduate Students’ Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, (6) hlm. 1-4. 020124, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020124, diakses 7 Maret 2013.
Mason, A. & Singh, C. 2011. Assessing Expertise in Introductory Physics Using Categorization Task. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(020110), hlm. 13- 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020110 diakses 7 Maret 2013.
Masruroh, L. 2014. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Pencapaian Konsep (Concept Attainment) Berbantuan Mind Map terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP. Tesis. Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Matsuka, T. & Sakamoto, Y. 2007. A Cognitive Model That Describes the Influence of Prior Knowledge on Concept Learning. J. Marques de Sá (Ed.), ICANN, Part II, LNCS 4669, hlm. 912–921, http://muscat.l.chiba-u.ac.jp/papers/icann07_prior.pdf, diakses 30 Maret 2013.
Mistades, M.V. 2009. Concept Mapping in Introductory Physics, Assistant Professor of Physics, De La Salle University. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(1), hlm. 1934-7200.
Mukarromah, A., Maftukhin, A., & Fatmaryanti, S.D. 2013. Peningkatan Kreativitas Belajar Fisika Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Snowball Throwing Pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Klirong. Radiasi, 3(2), hlm. 98-100.
Munfaridah, N. 2013. Pengaruh Brain Based Learning Berbantuan Mind Map terhadap Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Fisika pada Peserta Didik MAN Malang 1. Tesis. Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri J. 2010. Relations Between Representational Consistency, Conceptual Understanding of The Force Concept, and Scientific Reasoning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(010123), http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123, diakses 9 Februari 2013.
Ong, A. C. & Borich, G. D. 2006. Teaching Strategies that Promote Thinking: Models and Curriculum Approaches. Singapore: Mc-Graw Hill Education.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI No. 70 tahun 2013 tentang Pembelajaran yang Menekankan Pendekatan Saintifik (Scientific Approach).
Pepper, C. 2009. Problem Based Learning in Science. Issues in Educational Research, 19(2).
Pritchard, D. E., Lee, Y. J., & Bao, L. 2008. Mathematical Learning Models that Depend on Prior
Knowledge and Instructional Strategies. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(010109), http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010109,diakses 23 Februari 2013.
Rahayu, E., Susanto, H. & Yulianti, D. 2011. Pembelajaran Sains dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, (7), hlm. 106-110.
Ratmanto. 2012. Pengaruh Strategi PBL Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas XI SMKN Probolinggo. Tesis. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Reisslein, J., Reisslein, M. & Seling, P. 2006. Comparing Static Fading with Adaptive Fading to Independent Problem Solving: The Impact on the Achievement and Attitudes of High School Students Learning Electrical Circuit Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, hlm. 200-207.
Reyendra. 2012. Pengaruh PBL Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa SMAN 5 Malang. Tesis. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Rilly, S. 2012. Efektifitas Model Siklus Belajar Berbantuan Teknik Mind Mapping terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Ditinjau dari Ketrampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMKN 9 Malang. Tesis. Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang.
Sahin, M. & Memet. 2009. Exploring University Students’ Expectations and Beliefs about Physics and Physics Learning in a Problem-Based Learning Context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4), hlm. 321-333.
Setiawan, NCE. 2011. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Awal Terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA 1 Turen Pada Materi Keseimbangan. Tesis. Malang: Pasca Sarjana UM
Sugiyono. 2010. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sulaiman, F. 2013. The Effectiveness of PBL Online on Physics Student’s Creativity and Critical Thinking: A Case Study at University Malaysia Sabah. International Journal of Education and Research, 1 (3), hlm. 1-6.
Taufik, M. 2010. Desain Model Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dalam Pembelajaran IPA (Fisika) Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Kota Bandung. ejournal.undip.ac.id, 13(2), hlm. E31-E44. Edisi khusus April 2010, Diakses 22 Juli 2015.
Yardan, H. & Yardan, A. 2010. Learning Using Dynamic and Static Visualizations: Students’Comprehension, Prior Knowledge and Conceptual Status of a Biotechnological Method. Res Science Education, (40), hlm. 375-402.
Yuliati, L. 2008. Model-model Pembelajaran Fisika “Teori dan Praktek”. Malang: Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (LP3) Universitas Negeri Malang.