Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Kontribusi Kepemimpinan Transformasional Kepala Madrasah, Kinerja Mengajar Guru, dan Kultur Belajar Terhadap Peningkatan Prestasi Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Provinsi DKI Jakarta

Darwyan Syah
Submitted
Apr 18, 2015
Published
Jun 16, 2014
PDF (BAHASA INDONESIA)
Citation
Syah, D. (2014). Kontribusi Kepemimpinan Transformasional Kepala Madrasah, Kinerja Mengajar Guru, dan Kultur Belajar Terhadap Peningkatan Prestasi Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 20(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v20i2.136
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of principal transformational leadership, teaching performance of teachers, and the learning culture towards achievement of madrasah aliyah. Correlational survey is used as the method of the research with 274 sample of teachers .The sampling techniques used are area sampling, proportional sampling and random sampling. Questionnaire used as the instrument to be analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results of this study indicate: 1) the level of achievement of the madrasah, principal transformational leadership, teaching performance of teachers and learning culture is good; 2) transformational principal leadership contributes positively and significantly towards achievement of madrasah aliyah; 3) teacher performance in teaching contributes positively and significantly towards achievement of madrasah aliyah; 4) learning culture contributes positively and significantly towards achievement of madrasah aliyah: 5) transformational principal leadership, teacher performance in teaching and learning culture contribute positively and significantly towards achievement of madrasah aliyah. Accordingly, increasing the principal transformational leadership, teaching performance of teachers and the culture of learning leads to the improvement of madrasah achievement.


ABSTRAK

 

Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis kontribusi kepemimpinan transformasional kepala madrasah, kinerja mengajar guru, dan kultur belajar terhadap prestasi madrasah aliyah. Metodologi penelitian ini menggunakan survei dengan pendekatan korelasional. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 274 guru dengan teknik pengambilan area sampling, proportional sampling, dan random sampling. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan angket dan analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferensial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) tingkat prestasi madrasah, kepemimpinan transformasional kepala madrasah, kinerja mengajar guru dan kultur belajar berada pada kategori baik; 2) kepemimpinan transformasional kepala madrasah berkontribusi positif dan signifikan terhadap prestasi madrasah aliyah; 3) kinerja mengajar guru berkontribusi positif terhadap prestasi madrasah aliyah; 4) kultur belajar berkontribusi positif dan signifikan terhadap prestasi madrasah aliyah; 5) kepemimpinan transformasional kepala madrasah, kinerja mengajar guru dan kultur belajar berkontribusi positif dan signifikan terhadap prestasi madrasah aliyah. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan dapat disimpulkan bahwa peningkatan kepemimpinan transformasional kepala madrasah, kinerja mengajar guru, dan kultur belajar meningkatkan prestasi madrasah aliyah.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 471
Downloads : 385
References
Azizi, Q., dan Sholeh, A. R. 2004. Madrasah dan Pendidikan Anak Bangsa, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bass, B.M. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectation, New York: Free Press.
Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. 1990. Develoving Tranformational Leadership; And Beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14(5): 21-27.
Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. 2000. MLQ: Multifactor Leadership Questionary, 2nd edition, California: Sage.
Burns. M. 1978. Leadership, New York: Harper Collins.
Cavanagh, R.F. Dellar, G.B. Reynold, P.S. & Romanosky, J .T. 2005. Measuring Modelling Teacher Observation of How Principal Lead Renewal of the School Pedagogy. (Paper Presente in Division A at The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association Montreal, 2005).
Conger, J. & Kanungo, R. 1994. Perceived Behavioral Atributes of Charismatic Leadership. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science; 24 (1): 217-247.
Danim, Sudarwan. 2005. Menjadi Komunitas Pembelajar: Kepemimpinan Transformasional dalam Komunitas Organisasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 1994. Pengembangan Sekolah Unggul, Jakarta: Dirjen Dikdasmen.
Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Kelembagaan Islam. 2005. Pedoman Desain Pengembangan Madrasah, Jakarta: Departemen Agama.
Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan Depdiknas. 2003. Standar Kompetensi Guru SMU. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi DKI Jakarta. 2013. Data kelulusan Hasil Ujian Nasional SMA/SMK/MA di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. http://disdik.jakarta.go.id/. diakses tanggal 28 Nopember 2013
Edmonds. 1979. Effective School for the Urban Poor. Educational Leadership, 37, (1), 15-27 diakses pada 23 Mei 2005. ERIC Document Production Service No. ED13561.
Fadjar, A., M. 1998. Madrasah dan Tantangan Modernitas. Cet. I, Bandung: Mizan.
Freira, P. 1993. Pedagogy of The Oppressed. New York: The Continum Publishing Company.
Hery, Noer Ali. 1999. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: PT. Logos Wacana Ilmu.
Hiebert, J., Wearne, D. & Taber, S. 1991. Forth Gradual Contruction of Decimal Fraction During ntruction using Different Representation. Elementary School Journal. 97:321-324.
King & Menke. 1992. Providing The Instructur’n Note, An Effective additions to Student Notetaking. Educational Psychologist. 20: 33-39.
Komariah, A., dan Triatna, C. 2005. Visionary Leadership, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kozma, R. 1991. Learning With Media. Review of Educational Research, 1.179-211.
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Land, M.L. 1987. Vagueness and Clarity. In M.J. Dunkin (ed). International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. N.y. Pergam.
Marzuki, S. C.1997. Kajian Sekolah Berkesan di Malaysia: Model Lima Faktor. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Mayer, R.E. dan Gallini, J.K. 1990. When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Word? Journal of Educational Psycology. 82.715-726.
Northouse, G.P. 1978. Leadership: Theory and Pracrice. (4th Edition). Sage Publications, Inc.
Nurhayati, Budiarti. 2006. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi profesionalisme dan kinerja guru biologi di SMAN Kota Makasar Sulawesi Selatan, Mimbar Pendidikan. No. 4/XXV/2006. Hh. 64-70.
Pidarta, M. 1988. Peranan Kepala Sekolah pada Pendidikan Dasar. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Rahim., H. 2005. Arah Baru Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Logos.
Robbins, S.P. 1996. Essentials of Organizational Beharvior, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Rutter, M., Mughen, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. 1979. Sityd Univ. Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary School and Their Effects on Children. Cambridge M.A: Harvard Uiversity.
Slavin, R. 1994. Quality Appropriates, Incentive and Time: A Model of Instructional Effectiveness.
International Journal of Educational Research. 21(2).141-157.
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Badung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Supriadi, D. 1999. Mengangkat Citra dan Martabat Guru, Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.
Tola, Burhanudin, dan Furqon. 2003. Pengembangan model penilaian sekolah efektif. Jurnal Pendidikan & Kebudayaan. 9 (044) Sept.2003: 669-692.