Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Register
Login

Pengembangan Kurikulum sebagai Intervensi Kebijakan Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan

Bambang Indriyanto
Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v18i4.100
Submitted
Oct 31, 2013
Published
Dec 31, 2012
PDF (BAHASA INDONESIA)
Citation
Indriyanto, B. (2012). Pengembangan Kurikulum sebagai Intervensi Kebijakan Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 18(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v18i4.100
Abstract

The objective of this paper is to foster the notion that curriculum can serve as a standpoint to improving the quality of education. By stating so, it proposes an argument that the effectiveness of their implementations do not only depend on comprehensiveness of the concept, but also on their relevance to the circumstances in which they are going to be implemented. They include teacher competencies and the adequate availability of education facilities at school level. The on going curriculum development called Curriculum 2013 by the Ministry of Education and Culture are undergoing scrutinization by publics. This has been a consequence of curriculum as a part of education policies. Some cast doubts about the concept, some other support the idea of the development of curriculum 2013. This paper, however, argues, in spite of pro and cons, that management is an underlying factor which ensures the effectiveness of the implementation of the curriculum 2013. The concept of management consists of that in school and classroom levels. The present of information technology virtually in any walk of life, has positive impacts on education.

 

ABSTRAK

 

Tujuan dari tulisan ini adalah mengajukan pengertian bahwa kurikulum dapat menjadi titik tolak bagi peningkatan mutu pendidikan. Berdasarkan pernyataan tersebut, tulisan  ini mengajukan argumentasi bahwa efektivitas implementasi kurikulum tidak hanya terletak pada isi konsep yang komprehensif, tetapi juga pada kondisi kurikulum tersebut akan dilaksanakan. Kondisi  tersebut meliputi kompetensi guru dan kecukupan ketersediaan sarana pendidikan pada tingkat sekolah. Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013 oleh Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan yang sekarang sedang berlangsung sedang dicermati oleh anggota masyarakat. Hal ini tentu saja merupakan konsekuensi kurikulum sebagai bagian dari kebijakan pendidikan. Ada yang mempertanyakan tentang konsepnya, tetapi ada juga yang setuju dengan ide Pengembangan Kurikulum 2013. Namun demikian tulisan ini berpendapat, meskipun ada yang tidak setuju atau setuju, bahwa faktor yang mendasari efektivitas pelaksanaan kurikulum adalah faktor manajemen. Faktor manajemen yang dimaksud meliputi manajemen pada tingkat sekolah dan kelas. Kehadiran teknologi informasi praktis pada setiap aspek kehidupan membawa dampak yang positif terhadap dunia pendidikan.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 3949
Downloads : 2179
References
Anonim. 29 November 2012. Plans for New Curriculum Have Led To Confusion, Lack of Confidence. Jakarta Globe. Hal. 10.
Amelung, C. 2007. Using Social Context and E-Learner Identity as a Framework for an E-Learning. International Journal on ELearning; 6, 4; Hal. 501-517.
Boediono, 27 Agustus, 2012. Pendidikan Kunci Pembangunan. Kompas. Hal 5. Centre for Educational Research and Innovations (CERI). 2009. Beyond Textbooks: Digital learning resources as systemic innovation in the Nordic countries. OECD: CERI.
Checchi, D. 2005. The Economics of Education: Human Capital, Family Background and Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, P. 2010. Management Briefs: Management and Leadership Theory Made Simple. Bookboon.com. Coleman Patterson & Ventus publishing Apps.
Conger, J.A. dan Xin, K. 2000. Executive Education in the 21st century. Journal of Management. 24, 1. Hal.73-101.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta.
Danielson, C. 2006. Teacher Leadership that Strengthens Professional Practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD publications
Dewey, J. 2004. Democracy and Education. Mineola, New York: Dover Publication. Inc.
Drucker, P.F. 1999. Management Challenges for the 21st Century. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.
Duignan, P.A. & Macpherson, R.J.S. 1992. Educational Leadership for Curriculum Development: A Synthesis and a Comentary. Dalam Educative Leadership: A Practical Theory for New Administrators and Managers. London: The Falmer Press. Hal. 83-84.
Earley, P. & Weindling, D. P. 2004. Understanding School Leadership. London: Chapman Publishing.
Flap, H. & Boxman, E. 2001. Getting Started: The Influence of Social Capital on the Start of the Occupational Career. Dalam Lin, N; Cook; K; dan Burt, R.S. (Eds). Social capital; theory and research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Halpin, D. 2006. Understanding Curriculum as Utopian Text. Dalam Moore, A.(eds) Schooling, Society and Curriculum, New York: Routledge.
Hausman, D.M. & McPherson, M.S. 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, R. 2001. How to Build a Better Teacher. Policy Review; 106. Hal. 37-47.
Hopkins, D. 2001. School Improvement for Real. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Hutchin, R.M. 1999. Pendidikan Liberal Sejati. Dalam Freire, P; Illich, I, dan Fromm, E.(eds,terjemahan). Menggugat Pendidikan: Fundamentalis, Konservatif, Liberal, Anarkis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Leung, W. M. 2003. The Shift from a Traditional to a Digital Classroom: Hongkong Kindergarteens. Childhood Education; 80, 1. Hal 12-17.
Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa. 1977. (Cetakan ke 2). Karya Ki Hadjar Dewantara. Bagian pertama: Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.
McInstosh, S 2008. Education and Employment in OECD Countries. UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
Petters, M.A., 2010. Creativity, Openess, and The Global Knowledge Economy: The Advent of Usergenerated Cultures. Economic, Management and Financial Markets. Vol. 5 (3). Hal. 15-36.
Powell, W. W & Snellman. K 2004. The Knowledge Economy. Annual Review of Sociology. 30. Hal. 199-220.
Pultorak. E. G. (eds). The Purposes, Practices, and Professionalism of Teacher Reflectivity: Insights for Twenty-First-Century Teachers and Students. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Reid, J. 2005. Negotiating Education. Dalam Boomer, G et.al. (2005). Negotiating the Curriculum:Educating for the 21st Century. London: The Falmer Press.
Rohman, S. 3 Agustus, 2012. Kurikulum Berbasis Kekerasan. Kompas. Hal. 6.
Rose, C. & Nicholl, M.J. 1997. Accelerated Learning for the 21st century. New York: Delacorte Press.
Schultz, T.W. 1977. Investment in Human Capital. Dalam Karabel, J. dan Halsey A.H. Power and Idelology in Education. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scott, D. 2006. Six Curriculum Discourses: Contestation and Edification. Dalam Moore, A. (eds) Schooling,Society and Curriculum New York: Routledge.
Suwignyo, A. 26 November 2012. Prospek Kurikulum Baru. Kompas, hal. 7.
Walker. J.C. 1992. A Philosophy of Leadership in Curriculum Development: A Pragmatic and Holistic Approach. Dalam Educative Leadership: A Practical theory for new administrators and managers. London: The Falmer Press.
Wisnu. A. 22 Mei 2009. Character Bulding: The Missing Link in Indonesia’s Public School Curriculum, The Jakarta Post. Hal. 19.
Wisnu, A. 7 Juni 2012. Pendidikan Sains Masih Sebatas Teori. Kompas. Hal. 7.
1977. (Cetakan ke 2). Karya Ki Hadjar Dewantar. Bagian pertama: Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa. 29 November 2012. menyajikan judul artikel yang cenderung menyampaikan pesan pesimisme, sabagai berikut Plans for New Curriculum Have Led to Confusion, Lak of Confidence. Jakarta Globe. Hal, 10.