Logo

Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru Melalui Model Lesson Study

Rudi Prihantoro
Submitted
Oct 28, 2013
Published
Jan 1, 2011
PDF (BAHASA INDONESIA)
Citation
Prihantoro, R. (2011). Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru Melalui Model Lesson Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 17(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i1.10
Abstract

Lesson study (LS) is a competence development process in a systematic teacher professionalism which aims to make learning better and more effective. Stages LS ie Plan, Do, See. LS requires the stability of education policy, curriculum, flexible, self-reflection and cultural cooperation. Excess LS is oriented to students, working as a team, developing a teaching technique. LS development in the professionalism of teachers is to plan learning objectives and subject matter, review and develop learning; deepen knowledge that is taught; thinking about long-term goals of students; designing collaborative learning; examines the process of learning, behavior and student learning outcomes, and, develop pedagogical. LS carried out by forming groups of LS, LS focus, Planning the Research Lesson (RL), RL teach and observe, discuss and analyze the RL, as well as reflect and plan for re-LS. LS Benefits include triggering the emergence of self-motivation to develop, train educators to “see†the learner, making research an integral part of education, dissemination of innovation and new approaches, puts educators in a respectable position.


ABSTRAK


Lesson study(LS) adalah sebuah proses pengembangan kompetensi keprofesionalan guru secara sistematis  yang  bertujuan  untuk  menjadikan proses  pembelajaran  lebih  baik  dan  efektif.  Tahapan  LS yaitu Plan, Do, See. S mensyaratkan stabilitas kebijakan pendidikan, kurikulum fleksibel, budaya refleksi diri dan kerjasama. Kelebihan LS adalah berorientasi pada siswa, bekerja sebagai tim, mengembangkan teknik mengajar. Pengembangan LS dalam profesionalime guru yaitu merencanakan tujuan pembelajaran dan  materi pokok; mengkaji  dan  mengembangkan  pembelajaran;  memperdalam  penge-tahuan yang diajarkan;  memikirkan  tujuan  jangka  panjang  siswa;  merancang pembelajaran  kolaboratif;  mengkaji proses belajar, perilaku dan hasil belajar siswa; dan, mengembangkan pedagogis. LS dilaksanakandengan membentuk kelompok LS, memfokuskan LS, Merencanakan Research Lesson(RL), membelajarkan dan mengamati  RL,  mendiskusikan  dan  menganalisis  RL, serta  merefleksikan  dan  merencanakan  kembali LS. Manfaat LS diantaranya memicu munculnya motivasi untuk mengembangkan diri, melatih pendidik “melihat†peserta didik, menjadikan penelitian sebagai bagian integral pendidikan, penyebaran inovasi dan pendekatan baru, menempatkan para pendidik pada posisi terhormat.

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Read Counter : 1414
Downloads : 1549
References
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. 1993. In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Cerbin, B., & Kopp B. (2006, April) Lesson study: Building the scholarship of teaching and learning one lesson at a time. Paper presented at the 2006 CASTL Colloquium on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Madison WI. Retrieved June 29, 2006 from http://lessonstudy.blogs. com/college/2006/06/lesson_study_th.html
Fattah, Nanang. 2004. Landasan manajemen pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Fletcher, S. (2005) Using Digital Technology for Practitioner Research, in Research Intelligence, The British Educational Research Association.
Hendayana, Sumar. 2006. Lesson Study Suatu Strategi Untuk Meningkatkan Keprofesionalan Pendidikan (Pengalaman IMSTEP-JICA). Bandung: UPI Press.
Human Development Report 2005, International cooperation at a crossroads: Aid, trade and security in an unequal world. Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Copyright © 2005 by the United Nations Development Programme 1 UN Plaza, New York, New York, 10017, USA.
Lewis, Catherine.2000. Lesson Study: The Core of Japanese Professional Development. New Orleans: Invited Address to the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education American Educational Research Association Meetings.
Parawansa, P. 2001. Reorientasi Terhadap Strategi Pendidikan Nasional. Makalah. Disajikan dalam Simposium Pendidikan Nasional dan Munas I Alumni PPs UM di Malang, 13 Oktober 2001.
Podhorsky, C. & Moore, V. 2006. Issues in curriculum: Improving instructional practice through lesson study. Tersedia pada http://www.lessonstudy.net.
Sagala, Syaiful, 2000. Manajemen dan Kebijakan Otonomi Pendidikan Untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Makalah, PPS, UPI, Bandung.
Saito, E., Harun, I., Kuboki, I., and Tachibana, H. (2006). Indonesian Lesson Study in Practice: Case Study of Indonesian Mathematics and Sciemce teacher Education Project. Journal of In – Service Education.
Siskandar. 2003. Teknologi Pembelajaran Dalam Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Makalah. Disajikan pada Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran pada tanggal 22-23 Agustus 2003 di Hotel Inna Garuda Yogyakarta.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. 1999. The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World’s Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: Summit Books.
Suparno, Paul, 2005, Dampak RUU Guru Terhadap Kualitas dan Kesejahteraan Guru, Kedaulatan Rakyat, 15/11/2005, Yogyakarta.
Suyanto. 2001. Formula Pendidikan Nasional Era Global. Makalah. Disajikan dalam Simposium Pendidikan Nasional dan Munas I Alumni PPs UM di Malang, 13 Oktober 2001.
Tabrani Rusyan. 1992. Profesionalisme tenaga kependidikan. Jakarta: Nine Karya Jaya.
Usman, Muhammad Uzer. 2002. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung : Remaja Rosda Karya.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen.